My essays about healthy relationships with God, others, & yourself.

Category: Marriage (Page 1 of 3)

How Could It Not Occur to You?

When dealing with people, I sometimes hear a voice in my head saying, “How could it not occur to you?”

Over the years, I’ve noticed that it does not occur to people…

  • to rush over and give me a foot-rub.
  • to leave the dirty dishes unstacked.
  • to mumble less and speak up so I can hear them.
  • to remove the hair clogging the shower drain screen.
  • to turn off the lights when they leave a room.
  • to remove the laundry from the dryer.
  • to add to the shopping list the item you just used up.
  • to let us know when they arrive at their destination in a foreign country.
  • to send more pictures of the grandkids!

Lest you think I’m pointing fingers here, everyone in my family is likely saying the same thing about me.

It usually doesn’t occur to Mark

  • to put the tools away after completing a project.
  • to shut the cupboard doors.
  • to clean up the clutter off the floor.
  • to put the toothpaste back in the drawer.
  • to rake the leaves in the yard.
  • to withhold giving my kids advice until it is asked for.
  • to ask others before spray-painting our cars.

It’s a universal problem, but I have the perfect solution — everyone should become just like me!

If everyone was exactly like me.

  • I’d never be annoyed or frustrated.
  • I’d never be disappointed or caught off guard.
  • People would always attend to my every need.
  • They’d always say exactly the things that I want to hear.
  • They’d know when to leave me alone and when to engage with me.
  • They’d always do things precisely the right way every time [meaning my way, of course!].

The problem with my perfect solution is that no one can be me.

  • No one can read my mind.
  • No one can see through my eyes.
  • No one can anticipate what I would want.
  • No one can feel the feelings my body feels.
  • No one has the exact same Love Languages as me.
  • No one has my same concerns, fears, hopes, or solutions as I have.
  • No one knows exactly what I know or has exactly the same background that I have.
  • No one has the same expectations as I do.
  • No one has the same hang-ups, quirks, and dysfunctions that I have–and believe me, I have a LOT!

People can’t be me, and they can’t be you either!

So, seriously then, how do we handle it when people don’t get it–it simply doesn’t occur to them?

Recently, I had an epiphany about this that I want to share.

I’m realizing that I have two options when I start to think:  “How can it not occur to you…?”      

OPTION #1:  Incredulity.  (This is the option that comes naturally.) 

Option 1 is the default.  We become angry and feel wounded or victimized.  We ruminate on how the person ought to have known better.  We keep track of how many times we’ve told them what we want, and we keep score on how long it’s been since they did things the right way (i.e., our way).

Those of us who are non-confrontational “people-pleasers” will Stuff our incredulous feelings and become cold-shouldered toward others.    Those who are more confrontational will likely take others to the Woodshed or the House of Mirrors.   None of this accomplishes anything useful.

Option #1 may feel justified, but it just isn’t helpful.  Its focus is blame and shame and negativity.  It expects others to be mind readers.  It forgets that they are humans who often fail.  It wastes time, makes us bitter, and creates a wedge between us and others.

OPTION #2.  Ask a direct, polite question with an explanation of why it matters to you.   

Rather than expect the other person to intuitively think like me, I’m finding it more useful to just verbalize what I’d like right now–and why.

  • Could you do me a favor and rub my feet?  They are sore from running and that would mean a lot to me.
  • Can you help me with the dishes?  That would really make me happy.
  • Would you be able to remove your load of clothes from the dryer so I can get mine dry?
  • Can you let me know what your flight plans are so I don’t worry about you?
  • It means a lot when you remember to put the toothpaste in the drawer.  Could you work on remembering that?
  • Would you be able to rake the leaves by Monday when the vacuum truck is scheduled to come to our street?
  • Can you send us a video of grandson Jake making his hilarious donkey sound?  We would love to see it!

Rather than waiting for things to magically “occur” to others, let’s just ask for what we’d like right now.  It’s so much more useful!

The sin of not showing empathy.

In my last post, on fixing things, I spoke about the need to fix your relationship with a person (Fix#1) prior to fixing their problems (Fix#2).  I mentioned that the thing required in Fix#1 is empathy.

Empathy has gotten a bad rap lately, some even calling it a sin, so I thought it would be helpful to write out my thoughts on this important topic.   I’ve referred to empathy in many of my blog posts, so I’d better explain what I mean by that word!  I don’t claim to have the definitive word on what empathy is or ought to be, but I can at least explain what I have meant when using the word.

Admittedly, there is much cultural dissention today about what empathy is.  It all depends on what you mean by the word.   Charlie Kirk distinguished between empathy and sympathy, disdaining the former and favoring the latter.  Others like Brené Brown favor empathy over sympathy.  Joe Rigney recently wrote a book, The Sin of Empathy.

Some say empathy equates to feeling the feelings of others.  Others have said empathy is about connection with a hurting person.  Some define empathy as affirming someone’s “personal truth.”  Some see empathy as pandering to the sensitivities of others or advocating against injustice.

Ironically, but sadly, relationships have actually been severed over the word empathy, creating all the more need for it!

Some see empathy as a good thing, others as a bad thing.

It all depends on what you mean by the word.

Three factors may be at play with the dissention about empathy.

  1. Definitions.  Words change meaning over time.  One example is the word tolerance, which used to mean the allowance of opposing views to be freely heard.  Today, I’m called intolerant if I don’t applaud popular views which may be contrary to mine.    Empathy is another one of those words that everyone is redefining.
  2. Assumptions.  We tend to assume what others mean when they use the word empathy.  The problem is few people take the time to listen to what is meant by words.  For example, when Joe Rigney calls empathy “a sin” he’s not attacking empathy per se (i.e. the sharing of emotions) but he makes a good case against what he calls “untethered empathy,” which he defines as “an excess of compassion, when our identification with and sharing of the emotions of others overwhelms our minds and sweeps us off our feet.”
  3. Reactiveness.  People tend to react to words before learning what is meant by the words.  We live on the level of sound-bites, which can lead to fear, alarm, or sensationalism.  Calling empathy a SIN is sure to get people’s attention, a fact that I was not unaware of when I gave this post its title.  The unclarity in the contemporary use of empathy can get reactions. .

So what do I, Mark Forstrom, mean–and not mean–when I use the word empathy in my posts?

In my view…

  • Empathy is noticing and acknowledging that a person is in pain or distress and showing that you care about what they are going through.  No more, no less.
  • Having empathy does not imply that we feel the same feelings as another person  No one can understand exactly what anyone is going through.  We see through different eyes and are affected quite differently by life’s challenges.   No one hurts the same way, grieves the same way, or finds meaning in things the same way.  We can be affected by the emotions of others, but we do not replicate them exactly.
  • Empathy takes seriously the emotions of others without minimizing or mocking them.  I used to really fail at this, being logical, practical, and judgmental.  I didn’t have much patience for the emotions of others.  Thankfully, I’ve been challenged in this area over the years, and have learned how to acknowledge others’ emotions without judgment–whether or not I share them.  As this is a required skill for counselors, I’m glad I’m becoming proficient in this area!
  • Empathy should transcend human divisions.  I should be able to show empathy equally to people I agree with or disagree with.   Scripture commands me to love even my enemies, and showing empathy is part of that.
  • Showing empathy toward a person in distress doesn’t mean that I view their distress as necessary or healthy.  People can bring on their own distress.  Empathy shows that we care that they are hurting even if their pain is self-inflicted or unnecessary.  When our kids fail by acting irresponsibly, we don’t mock them, we don’t lecture them, we don’t say “I told you so”.  Instead, we show empathy in the moment–and let natural consequences be their teacher.
  • Empathy mustn’t soothe people in ways that would harm them.  We should support them in their immediate pain, but we mustn’t support things that would harm them.  We don’t provide beer to the distraught alcoholic.  This corresponds to the principles I value in When Helping Hurts.
  • Empathy does not jettison reality for the sake of feelings.   We don’t feed dog food to someone who is devastated that they weren’t born in a dog’s body.  We meet them where they are, but we don’t leave them there.
  • Empathy applies to the short-term needs of the moment. It is part of triage–it may function as a tourniquet to stop the bleeding.  Other interventions will likely be needed to attain wholeness after the person has stabilized.
  • As said in my last post, empathy is the first part of a two-step process.  Immediate emotional support (Fix #1) followed by helping them find wholeness (Fix #2).
  • Most personal growth happens not through receiving empathy, but through the discomfort of being challenged upward.  “Faithful are the wounds of a friend; profuse are the kisses of an enemy.”  Proverbs 27:6

In summary, to me…

Empathy is noticing and acknowledging that a person is in pain or distress and showing that you care about what they are going through.

No more, no less.

It’s simply saying: “You’re hurting and I care about that.”

In my view it would be a sin not to do that!

For those who like to fix things.

Some of us are fixers.

We don’t like problems–they make us uncomfortable. We want problems to go away. Right now! Problems stress us out. That’s why we need to fix things.

Fixers come in handy when it comes to home improvements.  Or car repairs.  Or pest control.

But unfortunately, fixers don’t do well in relationships. In fact, they tend to break relationships. It’s very ironic in that their attempts to fix relationships actually break them even more.

When it comes to relationships, it’s the fixers that need fixing!  So how do you fix that?

Well, there’s a two-minute video that I think really helps.  I show it to all my counseling clients who are fixers. I’ve shown it scores of times.  It’s hilarious, and yet profound. I suggest you watch it right now. Here’s the link: It’s Not About the Nail.

Spoiler alert:  please watch the video before reading on! You’ll be glad you did.

There is much to learn from this goofy little video. Here are the things my clients and I process.

  1. The most serious problem portrayed is not the nail!  The biggest problem is that there is wife who feels uncared for, unheard, dismissed, and alone in her marriage. She experiences pain, but worse than that, she suffers alone.
  2. Obviously, the nail is also a problem. It is the secondary problem, yet it’s the only problem the husband sees. “Get rid of that nail and everything will be fine,” he thinks.
  3. The husband is clearly uncomfortable with her distress, in fact, her distress gives him distress!  That’s why he rushes to fix the problem.  He cares for his own comfort rather making her feel cared for.  He clearly lacks empathy, a topic I plan to blog about soon.
  4. She finally convinces him that she wants him to just listen to her, which he reluctantly agrees to.
  5. When she’s finished talking, the pivotal moment comes when he says those four words,  “That sounds really hard.” I’d call that a very weak show of support, but even so, it impacts her profoundly.  She melts before him.  Suddenly she’s not alone; she feels heard and understood.  She’s immediately drawn to him both emotionally as well as physically–that is, until their ill-timed collision sets them back!

For you fixers, here are the lessons I want you to take away from the video.

First.  Remember that there are actually TWO problems that need fixing.  And the glaring one you so easily see is of lesser importance.  It is far more important that your friend feels cared for and not bypassed. The two problems BOTH need to be fixed.

Second. You must fix the bigger (invisible) problem first (FIX #1) and the smaller (obvious) problem second (FIX #2.) If you fail to do them in this order you may get the nail out, but your friend will remain feeling alone and uncared for in your friendship. You will have focused on a problem and entirely missed the person who has the problem.

Third.  Fixing the invisible problem of your friend’s hurting heart will not be intuitive to you.  Don’t try to guess what fix is needed, but plainly ask instead.  One of my favorite questions to ask when I see someone I love in distress is this: “What do you need from me right now?”  It’s a no-fail question.  Whatever the answer is will be exactly the fix you’re looking for in FIX #1. Make it a habit to ask this question whenever you see someone in distress:  “What do you need from me right now?” Their answer might be…

  • “I need a hug”
  • “I need some space”
  • “I need you just to listen to me”
  • “I need a backrub”
  • “Can you finish the dishes?–I’m exhausted”
  • “Can you help me think this through?”
  • “Can you remind me that it’s going to be ok>”
  • Can you pray for me?
  • “I don’t know what I need, but thanks for asking and when I think of something, I’ll let you know”

Whatever your friend says, you’ve learned the perfect thing to do.  The person will feel loved, understood, and valued–even by you asking the question.

And eventually, their answer will be…

  • “I need you to help me get this nail out of my head?  It’s the moment you’ve been waiting for!  And that’s where your skills at fixing will actually come in handy. The difference is that now you’ll be doing FIX #2 together as a team!

The Five Love Languages — what I DON’T like.

Last week, I wrote about what I DO LIKE about the concept of Love Languages, but there’s more to be said.  As promised, here are my problems with the Love Languages. I have two main concerns with 4 subpoints:

EGOCENTRISM First, we tend to deliver love only using our own Love Language(s).  Understandably, we do this because we see the world only through our own eyes, therefore, what makes me feel loved is what love is, right?  Wrong!  We should not assume that what makes me feel loved will make others feel loved;  different things matter to different people. I once had a dad insist he loved his daughter because he gave her hugs, (which, of course, he loved to receive).  But the daughter actually felt very unloved, because what mattered to her was not hugs, but words of affirmation.  He thought he was a loving dad, but was he?

A few years ago, Cindy and I held a marriage seminar at a church and one of our discussion topics, of course, was Love Languages.  One of the participants asked:  “What if you and your spouse have completely different Love Languages?”  That question got me thinking.  I realized that when our Love Languages are identical (for example, when two “Touch” people snuggle on the couch) the love displayed is natural, but not very profound.  But when Love Languages are vastly different, any delivery of love that accommodates the other person’s Love Languages is extremely profound!  Such love is unnatural, chosen, and intentional, and perhaps even costly and sacrificial–i.e. agape love! I concluded that the more unnatural the love displayed is, the more profound it actually is.  When I get a hug from my daughter who loves hugs it is wonderful, but not profound.  But when I get a hug from my daughter who is squeamish about touch, I feel profoundly loved–we both know that she left her comfort zone to deliver to me a costly gift of love.

ENTITLEMENT Second, awareness of our own Love Languages backfires when it turns into entitlement, causing us to think, “Aha! This is how I need others to treat me.”  Four problems stem from this.

  1. I am focused on my “needs.”  If I view my Love Languages as “needs,” then I’m going to have all the more reason to feel mistreated when others don’t treat me that way.  I’ve written before about the folly of being needy.  It’s wiser to view our Love Languages as merely longings and desires not as needs.  This perspective will make us more content and reduce our tendency to play the victim.  People will always fail us; let God be the one to meet our actual needs.  I can have joy even if my Love Languages aren’t met!
  2. I can develop a “UOME” attitude.  Awareness of our Love Languages can put our focus on receiving love rather than delivering it.  It’s easy to become self-centered, focusing on how others ought to be treating us rather than us becoming others-centered.  Romans 13:8 says we owe others love. It would be better to have an IOU attitude toward others–and accommodating their Love Languages will help us deliver the goods!
  3. I can manipulate others. Knowledge of our Love Languages might may us try to pressure others into treating us the way we want.  It’s easy to use Love Language terminology to coerce others with guilt and shame.  Sometimes we even weaponize Scripture to get the treatment we want.  It’s also possible to keep score on the failure of others or hold them to tests they didn’t know they were taking.  For example: “I’m incensed! You know that my Love Language is Touch but you haven’t given me a backrub for 83 days and counting!”  It’s important to remember that love can’t be forced or pressured.  It is only love if it is freely chosen.
  4. I can demand 50-50 treatment.  When we compare how we’re doing at accommodating others’ Love Languages vs. how they’re doing at accommodating ours, we can easily fall into the 50-50 comparison trap.  As I’ve written before, 50-50 is a dangerous equation.  It’s better to focus our attention on how to love others according to their Love Languages.  We will each answer to God about how we love others, so let’s focus on our part, not theirs.

So those are my concerns.  Overall, I find the Love Languages very helpful, but these pitfalls definitely need to be avoided!

Now let’s get out there and learn how to love people in their own Language(s)!

The Five Love Languages — what I DO like.

I really enjoy counseling people who are trying to rebuild or enrich their relationships. Quite often, our conversations lead us to The 5 Love Languages, a highly-influential, best-selling book by Gary Chapman.  The idea is that there are five primary “Love Languages,” i.e., different ways that people give and receive love.

Chapman’s five primary Love Languages are:

  • Acts of Service
  • Gifts
  • Quality Time
  • Touch
  • Words of Affirmation

I like how the concept of “Love Languages” highlights how people are unique. It’s not about loving others in general, it’s about loving  individual people–thus it’s important to know what makes a particular person feel loved.

Loving intentions don’t necessarily result in someone feeling loved.  I’ve had clients report feeling perpetually unloved for decades, despite a spouse’s consistent, sacrificial attempts to show love during all those years.  Like verbal languages, love can easily get lost in translation.  In fact, delivering the wrong kind of love feels like unlove to the recipient.  So, delivering the right kind of love is vitally important.  “Love Languages” provides a helpful framework for that, and thus I recommend the book as a way to discern which of the love languages are the most meaningful.

I have five additional insights about Love Languages:

  1. If you take a Love Languages quiz, you’ll likely find that you have a combination of Love Languages.  Pay attention to the ones that are especially meaningful to you, but also take note of those that are not-at-all meaningful. Others would benefit if they knew to deliver to you more of the former and less of the latter.
  2. Our Love Languages might change depending on who we’re with.  For example, Touch is my primary Love Language with Cindy, but not so much with others.  Words of Affirmation from a boss or authority figure might be especially meaningful to someone who grew up with critical parents.
  3. I have found that Love Languages change somewhat as we grow and develop.  Life situations, longings, and felt needs change over time, and so do the things we find most meaningful.  For example, I used to not find “Gifts” meaningful, but lately I’ve noticed how certain Gifts (thoughtful ones, not monetary) make me feel genuinely loved by Cindy.  If you haven’t re-assessed your Love Languages for a while, I would recommend it.
  4. The categories themselves are very broad, so consider how sub-categorizing may be necessary–for example, for some people only certain kinds of Words of Affirmation are meaningful.
  5. Finally, Love Languages need not be limited to the five categories at all.  I suspect there are as many variations as there are people with particular longings.  For example, I recently realized that I feel more loved when Cindy lets me keep my promises rather than doing herself what I said I’d do.  Another person might feel loved when others show sensitivity to specific hurts from the past.  Or someone might be impacted by having someone simply listen.  These are also Love Languages, even though they don’t necessarily correspond with Chapman’s five categories.

To summarize:  I like how the framework of Love Languages helps us identify the things that make people feel meaningfully loved.

 

Next week, in part 2, I’ll share what I DON’T like about the Love Languages.  It may surprise you!

 

 

,

Angry at someone? Consider letting the sun go down.

In my counseling office, I sometimes encounter couples who find themselves having frequent conflicts, often late into the night. One spouse wants to “talk it out” for hours on end until their issue is resolved, but the other spouse, convinced that the issue won’t be so quickly resolved, is tired, and honestly just wants to go to bed. The first spouse interprets this reluctance to talk as evidence of withdrawal, which adds even more conflict to their already conflicted relationship.

Often, the justification for these late-night arguments is a Scripture that I believe is taken out of context and harmfully misinterpreted:

Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, and give no opportunity to the devil.”  (Ephesians 4:26-27)

 

People take this to mean that the devil wins if we don’t resolve all of our conflicts before bedtime. But that’s not at all what it says. Aside from the fact that few us are actually in bed by the time the sun sets, the passage says nothing about having to hash out our grievances or understand all of our hurts before the day is done.

If we look at the context of these verses, Ephesians 4 has nothing to do with conflict resolution or expressing hurts to others.  Rather, it tells believers how their new life in Christ should display godly character.  “Not letting the sun go down on your anger” admonishes us to develop the character quality of anger management; it’s not a mandate compelling others to talk-it-out late at night.

To give our passage context, notice what the broader passage, Ephesians 4:25-32 [pasted at the end of this essay] says about how a Christian should behave.  Genuine Christians should:

  • speak truth, not falsehood
  • practice daily anger management
  • do honest work
  • share what we earn with those in need
  • use edifying talk that builds up, giving grace to those who hear
  • get rid of bitterness, wrath, and anger, clamor, slander, and malice
  • be kind, tenderhearted, and forgiving

Notice there is nothing in the passage that even remotely hints at deadlines for resolving conflict.  In fact, an ill-timed late-night talk would make many of those character standards harder to attain. It’s hard to be edifying, kind, and tenderhearted in the heat of the moment and when you are tired.

Today’s post naturally flows out of my previous one, which encouraged parents to postpone consequences until everyone can think straight. Â Knowing when to speak is just as important as knowing what to say.  This same principle also applies to marriage.

Certainly, I’m not against conflict resolution and the sharing of hurt feelings–they are essential for healthy relationships!  My point is that finding the right time and occasion is vitally important.  We’re less likely to listen and learn when we’re tired after a long day.  Attempting communication when we’re angry and upset puts everyone in fight-or-flight mode.  In such moments, we naturally go to the Woodshed, where no learning ever occurs.

Let’s wait until we’re in a better frame of mind, having that needed conversation at a time and place that will be constructive.  Let’s wait until everyone’s ready to go to the Classroom to learn and grow together.

So what about our misapplied verse?  What does it mean when it says:  “Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger and give no opportunity to the devil”?  Here’s how I read it:

  • Be angry.  It’s ok to be angry.  It’s ok to feel what we feel.  Better to admit it than pretend.
  • Do not sin. Being angry doesn’t justify our own sinning.  Be careful about what we are tempted to do and say when we feel angry.
  • Do not let the sun go down on your anger.  Verse 31 elaborates on this statement; it tells us to “put away” bitterness, wrath, anger, etc.  Our temptation is to stew over such offenses and hurts, but God calls us to put them away–right away.  Give your hurts over to God and let go of your anger–don’t let it consume you.  As I said two posts ago: “The Throne of God is the place for us to go to ask for God’s help in our time of trouble.  We should pray for God to give us wisdom and to soften our hearts toward the ones who hurt us, and we can pray that God would open their hearts as well.  This will accomplish as much as anything.”
  • Give no opportunity to the devil.  By getting our hearts right with God and with others, we rob the devil of his power to harm our relationships.

Let me summarize it this way:  if you give your anger over to God before bedtime you’ll be showing godly character–and you’ll likely sleep better too!

 

Here’s the whole passage, Ephesians 4:25-32, referred to above:

25 Therefore, having put away falsehood, let each one of you speak the truth with his neighbor, for we are members one of another. 26 Be angry and do not sin; do not let the sun go down on your anger, 27 and give no opportunity to the devil. 28 Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need. 29 Let no corrupting talk come out of your mouths, but only such as is good for building up, as fits the occasion, that it may give grace to those who hear 30 And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption. 31 Let all bitterness and wrath and anger and clamor and slander be put away from you, along with all malice. 32 Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you.

 

Oh the Places We Go! (when we feel hurt, frustrated, or upset by people).

In my work with people, I’ve observed that there are five places we go when when we are hurt, frustrated, or upset by others.

Three of these places make things worse, but the other two can bring a lot of healing, growth, and resolution.  It’s vitally important to know where each destination leads.

I’ve written about two of the five before, but today, I want to expand my thoughts to include all the ways we might address our frustrations.

Here are the five places we go:

#1 THE WOODSHED.  The first place we might take someone is to the proverbial woodshed.  In bygone days when someone misbehaved, they would be removed from the house and taken out back to the woodshed to receive a “whoopin.”  The walk to the woodshed was a walk of shame, and whatever happened in there was not going to be pleasant.

When we are hurt or frustrated or upset with someone, it’s easy to take the woodshed approach, giving the person a verbal whoopin’ and calling him or her out for what we feel he or she has done to us.  Yes, we’re being honest, of course, but honesty is not always the best policy.  In the woodshed, we exclusively use “You-statements,” blaming-and-shaming the person who has infuriated us so much.  There is no conversation in the woodshed.

The problem with this approach is that it causes added hurt (in response to hurt) and it doesn’t really accomplish anything, except perhaps the satisfaction of getting even.  It certainly doesn’t result in relational transformation.  When we perceive that someone is taking us to the woodshed, we naturally feel threatened and our natural impulse is to put our shields up, deflecting the incoming verbal missiles.

Physiologically, the amygdala in  our brain senses the imminent danger of the woodshed, shuts down our logical “thinking” brain, and sends us immediately into “fight or flight” mode. In this frame of mind, we don’t listen, learn, or consider anything.  We will either fight back to survive–saying things we rationally don’t really mean–or we’ll withdraw completely.  Nothing good results from going to the woodshed!

#2.  STUFF, ETC.  We who are less confrontational by nature will often stuff our negative feelings rather than take someone to the woodshed. We have learned to endure mistreatment silently, believing that the cost of saying something is greater than the cost of remaining quiet. We may feel too timid to bring up our concerns or we may not feel that we deserve to speak up.

The problem with the Stuff, etc. destination is that unless we’re really good actors, our dissatisfaction will likely be perceptible anyway — maybe not through our words, but certainly through our attitudes, tone, body language, and demeanor.  And even if we were to keep things stuffed for a long while, the pressure-cooker of pent up frustrations will eventually explode, taking us right back to the very place we were trying to avoid all along–the woodshed.  And we know how that goes!

#3.  THE HOUSE OF MIRRORS.  Have you ever been to one of those old-fashioned carnival attractions called The House of Mirrors? It’s infuriating because it’s like a maze inside–glass walls and mirrors everywhere you look–and you don’t know which way leads toward the exit.  It might seem fun at first, but before long, it can get very frustrating.  As you go along, you bump your face into a lot of glass walls!  Ouch!

This is exactly how some people handle their frustrations with others.  True, they avoid the direct-assault approach of the woodshed and they aren’t stuffing their feelings completely, but this approach fails for different reasons.

Those of us who use the House of Mirrors approach communicate our frustration in ways that are indirect and unclear, dropping not-so-subtle hints about things we don’t like.  Sarcasm is often used to make a point.  Snide comments, little jabs, and “just kidding” jokes all hint at unexpressed dissatisfaction.  Sometimes we play the victim, exuding a “poor me” attitude: “If only my wife would treat me respectfully like so-and-so’s.”  Social media provides us a easy forum for expressing subtle complaints in the third person:  “Why can’t teenagers these days be more respectful?”  And sometimes we keep score, using measurements others don’t know they’re being critiqued on:  “It’s been a whopping 31 days since you gave me a compliment!”

The House of Mirrors approach unfairly leaves the other person confused, insecure, shamed, and devalued–not the things that motivate people to change and grow.  Instead it invites push-back and resistance.

#4.  THE CLASSROOM.  Unlike the three previous destinations, the classroom is a great place to take the person with whom you have frustration.  While the woodshed strikes fear into one’s heart, the classroom is a positive place of learning, growing, discovery, and improving.  In the classroom, we help the person learn what we are feeling and experiencing when we are around him or her.

Here are two important “classroom guidelines:”

First, it’s vitally important to avoid blame and shame in the classroom, so stay focused on what has been going on within you rather than what they’ve been doing wrong.  This is the proper place for using “I-statements,” indeed, it’s very important to avoid “you-statements” all together, lest we risk turning the experiential classroom into a lecture hall.  In my previous essay on the Classroom approach, I gave several examples of recommended phrases, but here’s one example of what you might say:

“I find myself getting defensive when I feel criticized and I don’t like that about myself.  I want to share something with you that I think will help.  It would help me to grow and change if you could try to educate me rather than confront me.  I know that approach works better for me and I know it will draw us closer. I’d appreciate it so much if you could give it a try.”

In my experience, such a blame-free approach is often effective since the other person doesn’t feel attacked or threatened.  Respectfully expressing your concerns ensures that his or her “thinking brain” will remain at the forefront, where reflection occurs.  (Of course, you can’t guarantee how the other person will react, but in my view, the best chance for change occurs in the classroom.)

Second, don’t take the person to the classroom for every hurt and feeling that you experience.  That would be unreasonable and overwhelming–your whole relationship might seem confined to the classroom!  People need recess time!  Instead, start with one hurt that is either the most significant, or that is reoccurring, or that is easy to solve.  Tackle one at a time and then move on to the next.  You’ll gain confidence and celebrate progress with each lesson learned in the syllabus of life!

So get in the habit of taking the person you’re frustrated with to the classroom instead of the other three places you might go.  But there is one more place I want to mention.

#5.  THE THRONE OF GOD.  I mentioned this place last, not because it’s the least important — it is actually the most.  I first wanted to present the various response options to interpersonal frustration, but now I want to propose that there are many times when it is best to say nothing at all, and simply bring the hurts and frustrations directly to God.

Thankfully, whenever we’re feeling neglected or misunderstood or mistreated, we [Christians] have a God who perfectly understands our situation.  Jesus experienced more injustice, humiliation, and abuse than any of us ever will.

Although He doesn’t promise to spare us from pain, He promises to walk with us through our pain as a fellow-sufferer. God offers understanding, comfort, and healing when we are suffering.  We are not alone.

Jesus also modeled a supernatural power to love his enemies (including us!) and He can give us that same supernatural strength to rise above whatever mistreatment we may encounter from others, not returning evil for evil, and actually blessing those who have wounded us.  On the rare occasion when we do this, Scripture calls it “a gracious thing in the eyes of God.”  (1 Peter 2:19-24).

19 For this is a gracious thing, when, mindful of God, one endures sorrows while suffering unjustly. 20 For what credit is it if, when you sin and are beaten for it, you endure? But if when you do good and suffer for it you endure, this is a gracious thing in the sight of God. 21 For to this you have been called, because Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, so that you might follow in his steps. 22 He committed no sin, neither was deceit found in his mouth. 23 When he was reviled, he did not revile in return; when he suffered, he did not threaten, but continued entrusting himself to him who judges justly. 24 He himself bore our sins in his body on the tree, that we might die to sin and live to righteousness. By his wounds you have been healed.

I especially love the phrase “entrusting himself to him who judges justly.” As often as we are able, let’s give it to God to deal with and get back to loving others the way He loves us.

The Throne of God is also the place for us to go to ask for God’s help in our time of trouble.  We should pray for God to give us wisdom and to soften our hearts toward the ones who hurt us, and we can pray that God would open their hearts as well.  This will accomplish as much as anything.

The summary is this:  take your hurts to God first, and when we do feel the need to say something, let’s be careful to skip the Woodshed, Stuff Etc., and the House of Mirrors, and take them straight to the Classroom!  Oh, the places you’ll go if you do this well!

“I-statements” sometimes backfire.

We counselors commonly encourage our clients to use “I-statements” rather than “you-statements.”  I’ve taught this communication skill over the years as an effective way to express feelings while avoiding blaming the other person.  For example, when frustrated, I should talk about how I’m feeling rather than what you’re doing wrong.

But I’ve realized lately that there are times when “I statements” actually cause more harm than good. In such cases, it’s better to use “you-statements.”

One such time is when making apologies. I’ve written a lot about apologies over the years, but it was only recently that I realized that I-statements make for poor apologies. We typically say something like this:

  • I was a jerk.
  • I forgot.
  • I should have been more sensitive.
  • I drank too much.
  • I was a terrible husband.
  • I didn’t control my temper.
  • I didn’t manage my time properly.
  • I didn’t listen like I should have.
  • I’m sorry.

At first glance, it seems that “calling myself out” like this equates to a good apology.  Am I not being humble and contrite?  Am I not taking responsibility for my bad behavior? Yes, but something crucial is missing in these statements.

What’s missing is the other person!  Look how self-centered I am in each of the above apology statements. It’s all about me.  The summary of it all is “Look how bad I am.” What’s missing is any mention of you–the victim of my mistreatment.

It would be better to center the apology around you.

  • You suffered disrespectful treatment when I was such a jerk to you.
  • You were inconvenienced when I forgot.
  • You were wounded by my insensitivity.
  • You were frightened and made to feel insecure by my alcohol misuse.
  • A wife deserves to be treated better by her husband.
  • Your dignity was insulted when I lost my temper.
  • You felt unheard and unimportant when I didn’t listen to you.
  • You deserve more than a simple “I’m sorry”.

In my counseling office, what I refer to as a “full-orbed apology” contains these six “you-centered” elements:

  1. You were hurt in these specific ways (name them) by what I did.
  2. I feel genuine remorse and am embarrassed by what I did to you.
  3. If there’s any way I can make it up to you I will.
  4. I have learned from this failure of mine what I need to change to care for you better
  5. I commit to treating you better in the future as a result of my failure.
  6. I’m indebted to you, and I hope in time, you will be able to forgive me.

So the next time you fail (and you will!) why not try you-statements instead of I-statements.  My guess is that you’ll find it works much more effectively in repairing the damage you caused.

People are precious

I conceptualized this essay 18 months ago, but recent events in our family have shown me that it’s time to flesh out my thoughts.

My view is that people are fundamentally precious.  Genesis declares humans to be made in God’s image, after his likeness.   In Ephesians 2, Paul declares us to be God’s workmanship, a masterpiece.   As a kid in the 70s, I first learned this from a wall hanging in our church’s youth center:  “God don’t make no junk!”

Our culture seems to have forgotten that people are precious.  This is most clearly seen in politics, both by the politicians themselves as well as their ardent followers.   The derogatory things people say about their political opponents simply astounds me.  On both sides of the aisle, rarely is there any semblance of civility and decency toward one’s opponents.  Rather than critique policies that are seen as harmful, political speeches are more often laden with ad hominin attacks on their opponent’s worth.   I always found it ironic when politicians who defended the sanctity of life for the unborn, showed no sanctity toward the life of their full-grown opponents.

And of course, it’s not just politics;  social media is replete with vile, derogatory comments toward disabled people, minorities, non-minorities, and pretty much any people category that can be named.  Iowa’s record-breaking women’s basketball star is praised by many, but also relentlessly criticized and made sport of (pun intended).   Our outrage culture encourages derogatory treatment of anyone who is different than me.

A neighbor once introduced his kids to me as his “brats,” right in front of them.  He didn’t even give their names until I asked.  Those kids will likely live up to the expectations of their dad’s self-fulfilling prophecy.   How different this is from Psalm 127:3-5, which says:

Behold, children are a heritage from the Lord, the fruit of the womb a reward.  Like arrows in the hand of a warrior are the children of one’s youth.  Blessed is the man who fills his quiver with them!

Sadly, kids are often seen not as precious, but as problems — and America’s declining birth rate reflects this view.  Many people simply don’t want to be bothered with children.  Today, I just watched the movie “The Forge,” which is about a lazy teenager, Isaiah, who learned responsibility after adults showed him the folly of his ways.  But what I found troubling was that throughout the movie, Isaiah was treated as a problem child that needed reforming rather than as a precious person worth understanding and getting to know.

If there’s any place where a person should be seen as precious, it should be within the family.  Yet sometimes this is where it’s most difficult.  I do a lot of marriage and family counseling and this loss of preciousness is often at the core of family problems.  I wrote recently that spouses can adopt “villainous views”” of each other, forgetting the preciousness they saw on their wedding day.

And lest you think I’m only calling out others, despite my convictions I don’t always treat everyone as precious.  I was recently humbled about this very thing;  a former youth group parent called me out for ignoring and devaluing her son over thirty years ago.  She was right about my neglectful treatment.  I was very embarrassed to be told this, but was glad for the opportunity to confess my sin to her.  And it was a sobering reminder of how all of us can forget the preciousness of people and how hurtful that can be.

So what will help us improve our treatment of people?  Here are five things that may help.

  1. Straighten out your thinking.  Are there people in your life that you’ve come to view as problems rather than as precious?  Forsake that mindset.  As a counselor I see dozens of hurting people every week, and when they walk in my office door, I aim to view them as precious and treat them that way.  It is not a diagnosis that is walking in my door, it is fundamentally a precious person.
  2. Separate behavior from personhood.  To say that people are precious is not to say that people are always likeable and well-behaved.  Being precious doesn’t mean being faultless.  Scripture declares that when Adam fell, we all acquired a sin nature;  the image of God in us has been tainted.   But we can address bad behaviors while simultaneously treating the person as valuable.  My neighbor would do well to avoid labeling his ill-behaved children by their bad behavior.  Calling your kid a “lazy good-for-nothing” will likely 1. push him away from you, 2. reinforce these bad behavioral expectations, and 3. cause long-term damage to your child’s self-concept.  Calling out bad behaviors and choices can be accomplished while still affirming their preciousness.
  3. Serving badly behaving people helps people feel precious.  I love the recorded historical account of the early church father named, Polycarp.   When he was 86 years old, the Roman guards came to his house late at night to haul him off for execution (burning at the stake).  But before going with them, “he gave orders that a table should be spread for them to eat and drink at that hour, as much as they desired.”  What dignity he showed even to those who were sent to kill him!
  4. Treating people as precious is the best way to get them to act precious.  From a practical standpoint, if we want people to behave better, treating them as precious is more likely to produce change than treating them as villains.
  5. Sometimes we don’t think about how precious people are until they are gone.  That’s certainly how I feel about my 17-year-old niece Audrey, who struggles to receive love from others.  I wish she could understand how precious she is to her family, friends, and most of all, to God.  This post was a good reminder to me that I need to work on always treating her as precious no matter what.  I miss you Audrey!

Two of my favorite words

Communication is an essential ingredient to healthy relationships.  Today, I want to share two powerful words I added to my vocabulary decades ago that have kept my relationships healthy.  I hope these two words will help you too.

But first, one word NOT to use.

When we use the word why with others it almost always backfires, resulting, not in connection, but rather in defensiveness, pushback, and negative interactions.

  • Billy, why are you always so disrespectful to me?
  • Sally, why can’t you leave your brother alone?
  • Jake, why do you refuse to come right home after work?

There are at least two reasons to avoid why:

  • We often use why as an attack and not as an honest question.  You can see this in the illustrations above.  We might not be asking a real question–which is disingenuous–but instead might be declaring our conclusions, having already made assumptions about what’s going on.
  • For many of us, the word why is a “trigger word,” instantly making us feel we are under interrogation.   Interrogation puts us in fight-or-flight mode and naturally makes us defensive.  Why makes us feel like we’re on trial and being in the courtroom makes us anxious about being punished.  And we’ll do just about anything to avoid punishment.

To avoid creating such a scenario, I suggest replacing why with two powerful words that I learned decades ago:  observe and curious.    Here’s how they would have worked in the above illustrations.

  • Billy, I’ve observed you rolling your eyes and heaving a heavy sigh whenever I ask you to help around the house.  I’m curious, what is it about my request that is causing you to react in that way.
  • Sally, I’ve observed that when your brother comes into the room you often say unkind things to him until he cries and runs out of the room.  I’m interested to know what is causing you to treat him that way.
  • Jake, I’ve noticed that you’ve been coming home later and later.  I’m curious to understand what might be making you so slow about coming home after work.

Think of the significant and meaningful conversations that would inevitably result from each of those three scripts.

Observe and curious (or their equivalents) are not words of interrogation, they’re words of understanding; they take us to the classroom, not the courtroom.  When someone notices me and is curious about what’s going on with me I feel honored, not threatened.

OBSERVE simply states the facts we’ve perceived (without judgment).

CURIOUS  shows our interest in understanding the other person.

Avoiding why and using these other words forces us to be honoring rather than suspicious.  We’re suspending judgment, giving benefit of the doubt, gathering perspective, and demonstrating teachability.  It shows that we’re interested in knowing the other person more than accusing them, condemning them, shaming them, or manipulating them.  These words force us to delay judgment until after we’ve gained understanding first.  They help build relational bridges of connection rather than walls of opposition.

In short, your life will be changed by replacing why with observe and curious.

Do I observe some skepticism about that?  I’m curious to know what would prevent you from trying!

 

[Note: in case you’re curious, this is a revision of a post I wrote back in 2007, and I’m as committed as ever to these powerful words!]

« Older posts

© 2026 markforstrom.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑